Well, most of my direct experience with accessing this kind of info comes from Internal AT&T documents, which I no longer possess, and couldn't really share with you if I did.Originally Posted by Nadiar
That said, I have a pretty good grasp of the situation, and am glad to answer whatever questions you have to the best of my ability, but I will need to know what exactly you are trying to do.
In a nutshell (as of 2002) AMI is more compatible with various pieces of end user / customer hardware, while B8ZS is more suited to newer Multiplexors, smartjacks and CSU / DSU's. The simple reason is that AMI doesnt handle data very well -- if at all.
Another thing to consider, is due to syncronization issues, you only get 56kbps per channel of throughput on a D4/AMI circuit, where B8ZS allows you the full use of 64kbps. This may not sound like a big deal, but over 24 channels (a typical T1), or several T3's (28 T1's) it can really add up. Basically -- AMI is older technology, and primarily suited to voice transmissions, while B8ZS is a newer technology, and is suitable for voice / data / video.


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks